I have been using the Oppo X10 Pro Max as my daily driver for several weeks, and, honestly, it has surprised me in many ways—particularly regarding its camera system. Overall, the device offers an excellent user experience. With a price tag approaching RM7,000, the question is: is it truly worth it? Here is my full review after using it for an extended period. Specifications
Oppo Find X10 Pro Max
Screen 6.78″ LTPO AMOLED, 1B color, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 3600 nits (peak)
Crystal Guard/Ultra HDR
Mediatek Dimensity 9600 Pro processor (2 nm)
2 x Arm C2-Ultra 4.55 GHz chips
3 x Arm C2-Pro 4.35 GHz
3 x Arm C2-Pro 3.1 GHz
Arm Mali G2-Ultra NX Graphics Chip
RAM 16GB LPDDR5X
Internal Storage 512GB UFS 4.1
Primary Camera 200 MP, f/1.5, 24mm (wide) OIS
200 MP, f/2.1, 70mm (periscope telephoto) OIS
200 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultra-wide)
8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps
HDR, 10-bit video, Dolby Vision, LOG
Selfie Camera 50 MP, f/2.0
18mm (ultra-wide)
8000 mAh battery (SiC)
80W wired charging
50W wireless charging
10W reverse charging
SIM/Telephony Nano/eSIM
NFC Yes
No Audio Jack
Waterproof IP68/IP69
Scan System Fingerprint scanner
Face scan
Sale Price RM6999 (16/1000GB)
Usage Experience
What I As you might notice, the large camera module on the back of this device is more than just a design element; it makes the device easily distinguishable from most of its competitors on the market. Initially, I found the design a bit awkward due to the sheer dominance of the camera bump. However, after using it for a few days, I grew accustomed to it—helped, perhaps, by the fact that I had previously used the Find X9 Pro.
The underlying design DNA remains clearly evident, though the camera module is now larger and occupies more space. Whether this design is appealing or not is largely a matter of personal taste. That said, I believe Oppo is taking a risk here, as such a massive camera module might not be to everyone’s liking. Nevertheless, I must admit that it lends the Find X10 Pro Max a distinct identity, making it instantly recognizable at a single glance.
In terms of daily use, the size of the camera bump doesn’t cause any significant issues. The device remains well-balanced when held, with no noticeable imbalance in weight distribution.
I also appreciate the curves along the sides of the device, which enhance comfort—especially during extended periods of watching videos or browsing social media. The matte grey finish looks sleek and premium; it’s also more practical for everyday use compared to a glossy finish, which tends to attract fingerprints.
That said, I still feel that the Find X9 Ultra possesses a stronger design identity. That model more convincingly evokes the aesthetic of a premium camera, whereas the Find X10 Pro Max feels more like a modern device that simply happens to feature a large camera module. This approach isn’t necessarily less appealing, but it doesn’t quite deliver the same visual impact as its predecessor.
As for the front, it stands out as one of the device’s primary strengths. Oppo has once again succeeded in producing a high-quality display, featuring symmetrical 1.15mm-thick bezels on all sides. These slim bezels not only give the device a more premium appearance but also provide a more immersive viewing experience.
The brightness levels are sufficient for outdoor use; I encountered no issues viewing on-screen content, even under intense sunlight.
That said, slim bezels and a design focused on premium aesthetics no longer truly distinguish flagship devices today. Rather, these are features expected as a standard for devices in this price range. Nevertheless, Oppo has executed these fundamentals well, with no noticeable flaws in the display.
One of the upgrades featured in the Find X10 Pro Max is support for a refresh rate of up to 144Hz. The system can automatically adjust this rate—ranging from 1Hz to 144Hz—depending on the content being displayed. In practical use, the experience is exceptionally smooth, whether you are watching videos, browsing social media, or playing mobile games.
However, I feel that the upgrade from 120Hz to 144Hz might not be very noticeable to most users. The difference is hard to perceive during daily use and is likely only appreciated by those who are truly sensitive to higher refresh rates. To me, it serves more as an "added value" rather than a feature that drastically transforms the overall user experience.
Throughout my time using the device, I had almost no complaints regarding the display. The colors appear vivid, the content is sharp, and the overall viewing experience is highly satisfying. Support for Widevine L1 (for Netflix HD) and YouTube HDR further enhances the experience—though, in my view, these have become basic requirements for devices in this price range, rather than standout features that set it apart from competitors.
The only issue I noticed is that the auto-brightness function sometimes reacts a bit slowly in certain situations. It is not a major problem and does not hinder daily use, but I would expect a more consistent experience from a premium device in this price bracket. In my case, this only occurred on the specific review unit I tested and does not necessarily reflect the experience of other users.
I also noticed that Oppo has removed the "Camera Control" button that was introduced in the previous generation. Instead, the company has retained the "Snap Key," which can be programmed for various specific functions. Personally, I do not consider the loss of the Camera Control button a significant drawback, as I rarely used it myself. In fact, I don't believe its presence on the previous model was important enough for its removal to be considered a major loss.
That said, I feel the Snap Key has yet to reach its full potential. While it is useful for accessing functions like the camera, flashlight, translation tools, and "Mind Space," the customization options remain somewhat limited. Users still cannot assign their own preferred apps to that button—a level of customization that should be a fundamental expectation for a premium device. Consequently, the "Snap Key" feels like a feature with great potential that Oppo has yet to fully leverage.
As for the rest, the layout of the buttons and ports remains largely unchanged. The power button and volume controls are positioned on the side of the device, while the bottom houses the USB-C port, a speaker, and the SIM card tray. A second speaker is located at the top, providing a stereo audio experience. In terms of design, there are no significant changes, but the layout remains convenient for daily use.
Regarding audio quality, performance is adequate for everyday tasks. Sound is clear during phone calls, video playback, and content focused on dialogue. However, for music, the sound profile leans toward the flat side, with a lack of punchy bass that can make some tracks feel a bit lackluster. That said, the audio balance between the two speakers is good, and I encountered no distortion, even at high volume levels. Overall, the audio system performs well, though it is not one of the device's standout features.
The device also carries an IP69 rating for water and dust resistance—a feature that is increasingly becoming the standard in the premium segment. It is further equipped with an in-display fingerprint scanner, which proved fast and reliable, with no recognition issues throughout my time using it. Both features performed exactly as expected, and I encountered no problems during the review period.
Internal Hardware – MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro Chip
As is typical, Oppo does not hold back when it comes to hardware for its flagship series. This model is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro chip, built on a 2nm process, making it one of the most powerful devices currently on the market. Oppo also remains consistent in offering generous memory configurations—with options reaching up to 16GB of RAM and 512GB of internal storage—a feature becoming increasingly rare as some manufacturers scale back specifications to manage production costs.
In one respect, this approach is commendable, as users receive a comprehensive hardware package rather than having to rely on more limited base configurations. However, such high-end specifications naturally come with a higher price tag. The question remains: do all users actually require this much memory capacity for daily use, or is it merely an attractive "value-add" designed to look good on a spec sheet?
Below are the benchmark test results recorded by the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro chip in the Find X10 Pro Max, alongside several other flagship devices on the market for comparison purposes. Apple iPhone 18 Pro – Apple A20 Pro
Poco F9 Ultra – Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 – Exynos 2600
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold – Tensor G6
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra – Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy
Vivo X300 Pro – Dimensity 9500
Apple iPhone 17 Pro – A19 Pro
Antutu 3D
Score Device
Oppo Find X10 Pro Max 3,846,228
Apple iPhone 18 Pro 3,517,879
Poco F9 Ultra 4,077,407
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 2,463,934
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold 1,212,510
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 3,136,285
Vivo X300 Pro 3,507,869
Apple iPhone 17 Pro 2,634,345
Geekbench 7
Single Core Multi Core Device
Oppo Find X10 Pro Max 2546 9175
Apple iPhone 18 Pro 3999 11338
Poco F9 Ultra 2037 7914
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 1923 5091
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold 1764 4688
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 3651 10819
Vivo X300 Pro 3507 10469
Apple iPhone 17 Pro 3560 8835
3DMark Wildlife Extreme
Score Device
Oppo Find X10 Pro Max 6943
Apple iPhone 18 Pro 7843
Poco F9 Ultra 7353
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 4099
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold 3318
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 7375
Vivo X300 Pro 7075
Apple iPhone 17 Pro 5873
Oppo has also retained the virtual RAM feature, which has become standard practice among Chinese device manufacturers. Personally, I view this feature more as an "added value" rather than a genuine necessity. On a device already equipped with 16GB of physical RAM, the benefits of virtual RAM are difficult to perceive during daily use. While it certainly doesn't hurt to have, it doesn't offer any noticeable change to the user experience.
In terms of performance, the experience I had throughout my time using the device is truly beyond reproach. The interface runs smoothly, scrolling feels fast and responsive, and there are virtually no noticeable glitches or lag. Apps open quickly, animations remain consistent, and switching between applications is seamless.
I also used the device with several apps running in the background, and as of the time of writing this review, I haven't encountered any concerning memory management issues. Gaming performance is exactly what one would expect from a device of this caliber; most games run at high graphics settings without any significant problems. Honestly, it is difficult to find any notable flaws regarding performance.
Another aspect that caught my attention is how Oppo handles thermal management. During typical usage—which includes social media, video streaming, and moderately long gaming sessions—the device only becomes slightly warm. Significant heat is only noticeable when running benchmark tests or during sustained, heavy workloads.
Nevertheless, there is one question that still lingers in my mind. Oppo has consistently opted for MediaTek chips for its flagship devices over the last few generations, whereas some competitors continue to rely on Snapdragon chips for their top-tier models. This is by no means a drawback, as the performance delivered is truly excellent. That said, I do wonder whether this decision is driven by a strategic partnership or by Oppo’s genuine confidence in the capabilities of the MediaTek platform itself.
Software – ColorOS 17 (based on Android 17)
I feel that ColorOS 17 has matured and become more refined compared to previous generations. In certain aspects, the approach taken is reminiscent of iOS—particularly in terms of animations, icon selection, and attention to fine detail. Nevertheless, both systems retain their own distinct identities and unique strengths.
One feature that particularly caught my attention is the "Living Flow Design" concept. Oppo has succeeded in making every interface transition appear smoother and more natural. I also noticed that certain interface elements—featuring a "glass effect"—respond to the movement of the user’s fingers, making the overall system experience feel more dynamic and alive.
Furthermore, Oppo has paid close attention to subtle details that might go unnoticed by most users. For instance, the clock animation on the lock screen transitions seamlessly onto the home screen when the device is unlocked, creating a more cohesive and consistent experience.
Oppo has also incorporated "Manus AI" via an "Agent Mode," integrated within "AI Mind Pilot." Unlike many AI features that focus primarily on photo editing or text generation, Manus AI is designed to handle more complex tasks. Oppo offers several model tiers—Manus Lite, Manus Standard, and Manus Max—allowing users to select the level of AI capability that best suits their individual needs.
I had the opportunity to test Manus AI several times during this review period. Based on my experience, it performs well in assisting with a variety of tasks. However, it can sometimes take a while to generate an answer, particularly for more complex requests. I also encountered a few instances where it failed to provide any response at all. While the outputs are generally quite comprehensive, I suspect that most average users will not find themselves using it very frequently.
Manus AI employs a credit-based system, granting users over 100,000 free credits, with the option to link their own personal Manus accounts should they require more extensive usage. Additionally, Oppo provides a "GPT Agent" that can be connected to a user’s existing ChatGPT account. I find this approach particularly appealing, as it allows users to leverage AI services they are already subscribed to, rather than relying solely on the credits provided by Oppo.
There is also "Mind Space"—a dedicated area that consolidates screenshots, notes, and other vital information in one place for easy reference. While the concept is interesting, I did not find myself using it often during the review period; therefore, it is difficult to say that it has a significant impact on the daily user experience. That said, for users who prefer to store and organize various types of information in a single location, this feature could certainly prove valuable.
Furthermore, Oppo has introduced the "AI Photo Agent," an AI-powered image-editing assistant that enables users to perform various edits using text-based prompts. It can suggest edits based on the image content and even replicate the style of a reference image to achieve a similar look. In my experience, this feature streamlines basic editing tasks, eliminating the need to rely on third-party applications. The AI Photo Agent also supports prompts in Malay, though users will need to provide detailed instructions to ensure the results align with their expectations. Oppo also includes 20,000 free AI credits every month for two years with the Find X10 series, which can be used across various AI features. For users who require more extensive usage, Oppo offers a 'Pro' plan with 50,000 credits per month for RM32/month (or RM320/year), as well as an 'Ultra' plan with 100,000 credits per month for RM59/month (or RM590/year). In my view, the provided free quota is sufficient for most users, while the paid plans are better suited for those who frequently utilize AI features for productivity purposes.
I also noticed that ColorOS 17 supports on-device AI models, allowing various AI models to be downloaded and automatically updated via Wi-Fi. Although most users might not even notice its presence, this feature demonstrates that Oppo is becoming increasingly serious about integrating AI at the system level. Furthermore, Oppo offers five years of Android updates and six years of security updates.
Camera and Image Quality
The camera system is one of the most compelling aspects of the Find X10 Pro Max. Oppo has equipped the device with a triple-camera setup—featuring a 200MP main sensor, a periscope telephoto lens, and an ultra-wide lens. On paper, the specifications are certainly impressive. However, in the realm of modern devices, a high megapixel count alone no longer guarantees superior image quality. What matters more is how effectively the camera system leverages its hardware to produce high-quality images in real-world scenarios.
Regarding video recording, the Find X10 Pro Max offers a wide range of options, including recording at up to 8K resolution, support for Dolby Vision, 10-bit video, and a LOG mode for users who desire greater control during the editing process. It also supports recording in the "Open Gate" format, which provides greater flexibility during the editing and post-production stages. Notably, the device supports third-party applications like Blackmagic Camera, offering more options for users who desire deeper manual control when shooting video.
In terms of image quality, the first thing I noticed was how Oppo processes color. The images produced by this device appear closer to what the human eye actually sees. Initially, I felt the results were somewhat ordinary and not particularly striking; however, after using it for a while, I began to appreciate this approach, as the colors appear more natural and consistent across various lighting conditions.
Oppo also provides "LUMO" color profiles, offering various color-processing options to suit user preferences. This concept brings to mind the "Photographic Styles" feature on the iPhone, as well as the "Colour Palette" system found on several of Vivo’s flagship devices. While this grants users more choices, I feel that the differences between some of these profiles are not distinct enough to make a significant impact during actual use. In fact, most users will likely settle on a single profile and rarely change it thereafter.
Regarding zoom, I found that Oppo successfully maintains excellent image quality across various focal lengths. Color consistency and exposure levels are well-managed across the main, telephoto, and ultra-wide cameras, ensuring that transitions between them appear natural. Furthermore, the quality of digital zoom remains satisfactory, thanks to AI-powered processing.
However, I found that the AI processing can sometimes be excessive, particularly at higher zoom levels. In certain instances, the system appears to over-sharpen details, resulting in an unnatural look upon closer inspection. On a positive note, the stabilization system is commendable; it performs reliably and proves highly beneficial when capturing distant subjects—especially in scenarios prone to hand shake.
The portrait mode offers a somewhat mixed experience. On one hand, I appreciate how the camera processes skin tones, keeping them natural without overly brightening the face—an approach that yields a more realistic result. On the other hand, I believe the bokeh effect could still be improved in future iterations.
In some situations, the bokeh effect appears somewhat exaggerated, which can make the image look less natural. That said, the overall subject separation remains quite good. I also did not encounter any significant issues in areas that are typically problematic, such as the space between the frames of a subject's glasses and their face. I also feel that the choice of focal lengths for portrait mode remains somewhat limited. It is not a major issue, but for a device in this price range, I would expect more options to provide users with greater flexibility.
The 200MP Hasselblad Hi-Res mode is one of the features I found most difficult to evaluate. From a technical standpoint, the level of detail captured is truly impressive. Images remain sharp even when heavily cropped, and the 'AI Detail' technology helps maintain a high level of detail.
At the same time, I feel this mode is better suited for specific scenarios rather than as a primary, go-to photography mode. The colors produced tend to be softer, with lower contrast and less vibrancy compared to the standard mode. In bright daylight, the results sometimes require a bit of post-processing to achieve the look I desire.
The ultra-wide camera, on the other hand, delivers a compelling performance. Distortion (the 'fish-eye' effect) at the edges of the frame is well-controlled, and sharpness toward the edges remains satisfactory. In fact, I found myself using the ultra-wide camera more frequently than the Hi-Res mode, as its output is better suited for everyday use.
Battery and Charging
Based on recorded usage, the device's battery life varies significantly depending on how it is used. In a session involving intensive camera use for 1 hour and 39 minutes, the device achieved 5 hours and 9 minutes of screen-on time. This figure is quite reasonable, considering that the camera system is one of the most power-intensive components on the device.
Different usage patterns were observed in two other scenarios, where the device recorded 9 hours and 14 minutes and 10 hours and 32 minutes of screen-on time, respectively. These two types of usage are more focused on social media and messaging applications such as WhatsApp, Instagram, Threads, and TikTok.
In the Box
Here is what you get in the box with your purchase:
1x Oppo Find X10 Pro Max
1x USB-A to USB-C charging cable
1x 80W SuperVOOC USB-A charger
1x Protective case
1x Manual
1x SIM ejector pin
Conclusion
Overall, the Find X10 Pro Max is a well-balanced flagship device. It offers a solid camera system, fast performance, a high-quality display, satisfactory battery life, and a mature software experience. In most respects, it is difficult to find any flaws that would significantly impact daily use.
That said, I feel that not all the introduced updates offer a major impact for the user. Features such as the 144Hz display, virtual RAM, "Snap Key," and certain AI functions feel more like "nice-to-have" additions rather than features that fundamentally transform the user experience. At a price point approaching RM7,000, I would have expected more significant innovations that clearly distinguish this device from its predecessor.
For those seeking a premium device with a versatile camera system, consistent performance, and a polished user experience, the Find X10 Pro Max is a recommended choice. However, for existing Find X9 Ultra users, the improvements here may not be substantial enough to make an upgrade necessary. The same applies to users who do not prioritize photography or AI features, as most of the enhancements are evolutionary rather than drastic changes. Ultimately, the Find X10 Pro Max does not attempt to create an entirely new category; instead, it refines the existing formula in a highly convincing manner.
Pros
Versatile camera system with natural color reproduction.
Fast and consistent performance.
High-quality 144Hz display.
Good battery life. Excellent telephoto stabilization system.
ColorOS 17 is becoming more mature.
80W fast charging.
Drawbacks
Snap Key remains limited in terms of customization.
Portrait mode is not always consistent.
The 200MP Hi-Res mode is only suitable for specific situations.
Virtual RAM offers little real-world benefit.
Not all updates feel significant compared to the previous generation.
